Evaluation of perlimerenary task:
As a class we had to show each other our sequences and
give feedback on what was good and what we think should be improved. what went
well: was keeping the camera steady this is because we used the tripod also
moving in frame with the character i found was very good as well when we didn't
use the tripod it was very steady for example when walking up the stairs
following the employee walking into the classroom. we used a variety of
different shots: mid shot low angle shots and close ups that gave a great
effect as they all matched the situation. however there was a lot of room for improvements
if we could do this again, we would need to work on continuity editing for
example when it cut it was light then the next cut it was dark that is
something we need to concentrate on. we also go feedback from the class that
our match on action wasn't that great so that will be something we will need to
look at as well, this was the shot were the boss was standing up but the cut
didn't match as he was sitting down when it cut, we need to concentrate on
using match on action. we also got told that we shouldn't pan, as we panned
when the boss and employee were having the interview, pan is mostly used in
documentaries it is best if we just used cutaways .when we were editing our
sequence we used a lot of fade out's this was only because there were some
errors in our filming and that was the only way we could have covered it
however next time we will have more time to make change and we also use
cutaways as that would have made the shot smoother and look more realistic this
would have also added to the mise en scene . To conclude I feel that because
our time was limited we were not able to show what we could have done more to
improve and the sequence could have been a lot more better however our mistakes
that we made this time will help us on our next task and we will have an idea
on what we shouldn't do.
No comments:
Post a Comment